The decision to remove female Relief Society leaders from the stands during Latter-day Saint Sunday services has sparked outrage and confusion among women in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
In a surprising move, the presence of female leaders on the stand during Sunday services in some congregations of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) has been abruptly discontinued. This decision, made by the North America West Area president, has left many women feeling excluded and undervalued. While the church claims that this change aligns with its long-established worship service practices, it has left female members questioning why they are allowed to sit with male leaders at the General Conference but not at the local level. The removal of female leaders from the stands has sparked a wave of discontent and calls for greater inclusion and recognition of women’s contributions within the LDS community.
A Symbol of Inclusion and Recognition
For over a decade, some LDS congregations in the San Francisco Bay Area have included female Relief Society leaders on the stand during Sunday services. This practice was seen as a powerful symbol of inclusion and recognition, signaling that women were an integral part of the community’s leadership. However, last month, the decision to remove female leaders from the stands was handed down without any input from the affected women or explanation for the change. This decision has left many women feeling hurt, undervalued, and questioning their place within the LDS community.
A Slap in the Face
The abrupt removal of female leaders from the stands has been met with disappointment and frustration among LDS women. Laurel McNeil, a Relief Society president in Sunnyvale, describes the decision as a “slap in the face.” She and other women feel that they are being punished for no apparent reason, despite their dedicated service to the church. The presence of female leaders on the stand served as a visible symbol of the important work that women do within the LDS community, inspiring young men and adult men alike. The removal of this symbol has left many women feeling marginalized and unacknowledged.
Seeking Answers and Expressing Concerns
In response to the decision, members in several stakes surrounding San Francisco have expressed their concerns to local leaders and launched a letter-writing campaign to church headquarters in Salt Lake City. These women, described as faithful and orthodox, not rebels or activists, feel deeply hurt by the sudden change. They believe that their voices should have been heard and that there should have been open dialogue before such a significant decision was made. The lack of communication from church headquarters has only deepened their sense of frustration and disappointment.
The Ripple Effect of the Ordain Women Movement
The decision to remove female leaders from the stands comes in the wake of the Ordain Women movement, which called for the ordination of women to the all-male LDS priesthood. The movement, led by women like Kate Kelly, sought to challenge the patriarchal structure of the church and advocate for greater gender equality. While the movement faced criticism and resulted in excommunication for some of its leaders, it also brought about changes within the church. These changes included the live broadcast of the men’s priesthood meeting, increased representation of women in top committees, and the inclusion of top female church leaders in official charts and photographs.
Creative Inclusion Efforts and Unconventional Choices
In an effort to create more opportunities for women within LDS congregations, bishops and stake presidents have explored unconventional choices. Some wards have allowed women to serve as executive secretaries to bishoprics, attend bishopric meetings, conduct baptisms of their own children, and pass the sacrament into the women’s restroom for nursing mothers. These initiatives, although not officially endorsed by the General Handbook, were seen as steps towards greater gender inclusion and recognition of women’s contributions. However, the recent decision to remove female leaders from the stands raises questions about the church’s commitment to inclusivity.
A Step Backward?
The decision to remove female leaders from the stands is seen by many, including author Neylan McBaine, as a significant step backward. McBaine, who has written extensively on women’s roles within the LDS community, argues that the church should be finding ways to increase women’s visibility and inclusion, rather than diminishing their presence. She calls attention to the arbitrary nature of the decision and highlights the contradiction between women’s ability to pray and speak from the pulpit but not serve in visible leadership roles. McBaine warns that if the church continues to exclude and diminish women, it risks losing the younger generation.
Conclusion:
The decision to remove female Relief Society leaders from the stands during LDS Sunday services has sparked controversy and discontent among women in the LDS community. Many women feel hurt, undervalued, and excluded by this sudden change. The presence of female leaders on the stand was seen as a symbol of inclusion and recognition, inspiring young men and adult men alike. The decision to remove them without explanation or input from the affected women has left many questioning their place within the church. As the LDS community grapples with issues of gender equality and inclusion, it is crucial to engage in open dialogue and find ways to empower and recognize the contributions of all members, regardless of gender.
Leave a Reply